NRRF

NRRF - Article - Kids are the victims of Whole Language failure

California

The California State Board of Education just passed the nation's most explicit definition of decodable text. No publisher in this country could possibly misunderstand the intent of the California State Board of Education. The textbooks which will teach California children how to read will be based on sound medical/scientific reading research. The California State Board appears to have plugged all escape routes and has left no "wiggle room" for whole-language advocates to practice their failed methods on unsuspecting little children.

Criteria for 2002 Language Arts Adoption

(Adopted by the State Board of Education on December 8, 1999 with minor edits made as of January 13, 2000)

Since 1997, California has adopted critical elements of a comprehensive system for reading and language arts. This system includes State Board of Education approved content standards, a framework, and a statewide assessment system. The English-Language Arts Content Standards for California Public Schools and the Reading/Language Arts Framework for California Public Schools provide the basic foundation for the design of instructional materials. All students, including students with special needs, will be tested on mastery of the English-language arts content standards in the statewide testing program. The testing program includes STAR (SAT9 and Standards Based Test), a high school exit exam (in development) and an English Language Development Test (in development). All students will be required to take the first two exams, and English learners will be required, in addition, to take the English Language Development Test.

All students must have equal opportunities to master these standards and equal opportunities to perform well on the assessments. California is moving toward a system where instructional materials are designed to ensure that: 1) virtually every student participates in the regular classroom and has access to the basic curriculum; and 2) teachers are provided with the support they need to ensure that all students succeed.

The diversity of California's student population demands a unique design for instructional materials. All students should fully participate in a basic reading/language arts program of one to two and one half hours in length, utilizing comprehensive instructional materials that address all of the language arts content standards for each grade level in a coherent fashion. The instructional materials should thoughtfully and logically address the development of skills and knowledge within the strands that build through the grade levels. Instructional materials that are designed in this way will be a key element in ensuring that students are prepared to pass the required assessments.

The basic reading/language arts program should utilize instructional materials that are designed to foster universal access, which means access for all students. These materials would include specific suggestions, in the teacher's edition, for providing universal access to the curriculum as well as standards-based extensions of the curriculum for advanced students. Instructional materials should describe specific ways for the teacher to address the learning needs of all students and thereby ensure access for all students to the basic grade-level materials and instruction. Instructional materials for the basic reading/language arts program should be developed for the following minimal daily time periods: one hour at kindergarten; two and a half hours at grades one through three; two hours at the upper elementary grades (grades four through five or six); and at least one and up to two hours at the intermediate grades (grades six or seven and eight).

In addition to the basic program, some students will need extra assistance to successfully complete grade-level content. All publishers are asked to provide additional instructional materials for special populations of students. The purpose of these additions to the program is to ensure that students will participate successfully in the basic reading/language arts program and will achieve mastery of the English-language arts standards. These materials would include 1) teacher and pupil editions of English language development support materials for English learners of approximately 30 to 45 minutes each day to be used in addition and connected to the basic instruction in the regular classroom; 2) teacher and pupil editions of special education support materials for special education pupils of approximately 30 to 45 minutes each day to be used in addition and connected to the basic instruction in the regular classroom.

Publishers are also encouraged to provide instructional materials for three special populations of students (students in grades four through eight whose reading achievement is significantly below grade level, English learners in grades four through eight who are at the beginning through intermediate levels of English proficiency, and students studying in languages other than English) as described in the box below. Required and optional program components are noted below. By providing teachers with the tools to organize instruction around the needs of learners and supplying teachers with the appropriate instructional materials their students need, California can maximize the chances that each student will have the opportunity to learn the skills and knowledge embodied in the standards.

This document provides criteria for evaluating reading/language arts instructional materials in five categories: (1) alignment with the content in the English-Language Arts Content Standards; (2) program organization; (3) assessment; (4) universal access; (5) instructional planning and support. Instructional materials in reading language arts must support teaching that is aligned with the standards and the framework. Materials that fail to meet the content criteria in category 1 will not be considered satisfactory for adoption. Within category 4, universal access, some criteria are optional and some are required. The criteria in categories 2 through 5 will be considered holistically. In addition to the five categories, all instructional materials must meet all applicable requirements contained in codes and regulations, including Education Code sections 60040, 60041, 60042, and 60044, and applicable sections of the Title 5 Regulations.

Required components

All publishers must design basic reading/language arts instructional materials that incorporate principles of universal access for the following minimal daily time periods:

In addition, all publishers must design two additional supporting components that reinforce and extend the basic program:

Optional programs

Criteria Category 1: Alignment with English-Language Arts Content Standards

Criteria Category 2: Program Organization

  • Criteria Category 3: Assessment
  • Criteria Category 4: Universal Access

    Introduction

    The goal of reading/language arts programs in California is to ensure access to high-quality curriculum and instruction for all students and teachers so they can meet or exceed the state's English-language arts content standards. To reach that goal, teachers must be provided with instructional materials that will provide them with the necessary content and pedagogical tools to teach students to master the standards. Teachers need assistance in using assessments for planning programs, differentiating curriculum and instruction, determining effective grouping strategies, and implementing other strategies for meeting the needs of students with reading difficulties, special education students, advanced learners, English learners, and students with a combination of these needs. The basic reading/language arts materials must encompass a range of materials for teacher and pupil editions sufficient to meet the needs of students at various benchmarks and strategic levels of intervention.

    Instructional materials present comprehensive guidance for teachers in providing effective, efficient instruction for all students. Instructional materials must be constructed to meet the needs of those who enter school above, at, or one or more grade levels below the content standards, and therefore are adaptable to each student’s point of entry. Such differentiated instruction will always need to be focused on the standards. All suggestions and procedures for meeting the instructional needs of students are not to be added as superficial afterthoughts to the main focus of instruction. Rather, the instructional materials need to be constructed so that the teacher is not expected to create extensive modifications in order to meet the learning needs of a full range of students.

    This category covers criteria for universal access of all instructional materials; however, publishers should give special attention to materials developed for four specific groups outlined in this section: special education; students in grades four through eight who are significantly below grade level in reading; advanced learners; and English learners (EL).

    The following design principles are guidelines for publishers to use in creating materials that will allow access for all students.

    Design Principles for Perceptual Alternatives

    Design Principles for Cognitive Alternatives

    Design Principles for Means of Expression

    The following design principles are guidelines for publishers to use in creating materials that will allow access for specific groups of students:

    (a) Special Education - criteria for an additional 30-45 minutes of instructional materials

    (b) Intensive instruction for students in grades four and above who are significantly below grade level in reading (estimated 2.5 to 3 hour comprehensive program). Publishers may, but are not required to, provide this intervention program. Publishers may submit such an intervention program as a "stand-alone."

    (c) Design Principles for Advanced Learners (to be included within basic materials)

    (d) English Learners (EL) - criteria for 30-45 minutes of additional instructional materials

    (e) Intensive instruction for students in grades four and above who are at the beginning through intermediate levels of English proficiency and who may have little prior schooling or limited literacy (estimated 2 to 3 hour comprehensive program). Publishers may, but are not required to, provide this program. Publishers may submit such a program as a "stand-alone."

    (f) Comprehensive reading/language arts materials in languages other than English

    Criteria Category 5: Instructional Planning and Support

    (See pages 8 and 9 of Reading/Language Arts Framework for the Key to Curricular and Instructional Profiles. In addition, see profiles within the section of each grade level)

    Teacher editions should include the following:

    Partial list of references:

    California Department of Education, Reading/Language Arts Framework for California Public Schools, 1999

    California Department of Education, English-Language Arts Content Standards, 1997

    Kinsella, Kate, "Considerate Text Principles," Presentation to California Curriculum Development and Supplemental Materials Commission, May, 1998

    National Center to Improve Tools of Educators (NCITE); http://idea.oregon.edu/~ ncite/

    Orkwis, Raymond and McLane, Kathleen, A Curriculum Every Student Can Use: Design Principles for Student Access, The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education, The Council for Exceptional Children, 1998.

    California Special Education Reading Task Force and California Department of Education, The California Reading Initiative and Special Education in California: Critical Ideas to Focus Meaningful Reform, 1999


    Home | About Us | About Phonics | Resources
    Research | Topics | Reading Reform | Links | Search

    The National Right to Read Foundation
    P.O. Box 560
    Strasburg, VA 22657

    Unless otherwise noted, you may copy and distribute any information on this site as long as The National Right to Read Foundation at www.nrrf.org is given credit. The National Right to Read Foundation is a 501(c)(3) publicly supported organization.